in
the papers...
|
HEALTH PLAN SAVES ULSTER RETIREES MONEY
Legislator
Robert Aiello, with a little bit of work and a little
bit of investigation, was able to come up with a plan
that is at least equal, if not better, than the current
plan, and at 40 to 50 percent less in premium costs.
Aiello said that savings with the new plan average abut
$1,500 a year per person, and range from $800 to $5,000
a year. County retirees pay half of health insurance
premiums for themselves and their spouses. Aiello said
he secured the plan through Tony Nardo of Mutual of
Omaha and also said the plan is aimed at county workers
who have Medicare as their primary coverage, and use
one of several other plans offered by the county as
secondary coverage.
It’s a true wrap-around program and picks up the
difference that Medicare doesn’t provide. County
retirees wanting more information can call Mr. Nardo
at 246-5910. Aiello said that home visits are available
| 
One small business to another
When
the county closed a bridge connecting Mt. Marion
park to Glasco Turnpike, a small business owner
said: "He lost 80% of his business the first
night..."
Not only was this a loss of business, but it caused
concerns about fire safety, school crossings,
access for emergency vehicles and livlihood.
With
Aiello's aid, the bridge remained open and a traffic
light was installed. The business man was quoted.
" I am elated as can be."
|
Dear
Editor:
On November 29th I received, pursuant to Saugerties Planning
Board Regulations, a letter advising me that an application
had been filed by Highland Cliffs to obtain planning board
approval for up to seventy-five condominiums to be located
on Skyline Drive in Barclay Heights.
I have been a resident of Barclay Heights for thirty-three
years, and have many concerns about the proposed project.
I attended the first meeting December 19, as well as consecutive
meetings with many of my neighbors in Barclay Heights,
and have since been part of a grassroots network of citizens
against this project.
I have stayed in contact with Saugerties Supervisor Greg
Helsmoortel throughout this process and feel confident
that the concerns of the residents have been heard, and
equally confident that there will be some sort of resolve
to this issue. Meanwhile I want to thank the Supervisor
for keeping us abreast of the progress to date.
Robert Aiello, resident and Legislator
MIDDLE
SCHOOL CONCEPT
Despite the investment second only to
our national defense budget, public education in the
U. S. is just not working.
The first step toward solving a problem is to acknowledge
and define it. Administrative policies dictating how
teachers should teach or how they should grade are taking
the initiative out of the profession, inhibiting one’s
capabilities and aspirations. Recent controversy should
encourage us to explore the educational soundness of
a move to the middle school concept.
In theory, middle schools follow the junior high school
approach in that they are more like secondary schools
than elementary schools. After more than 20 years of
debate and experiment there is still reason to doubt
that many school systems make the move for the right
educational reasons. Renewed controversy in a study
by the Carnegie Task Force on Education of Young Adolescents,
has been generated by the increasing tendency of school
systems t move not only sixty-graders into middle schools,
but fifth-graders as well. According to the study, listed
in the American School Board Journal, many parents and
educators feel that 10 year-olds are emotionally and
socially unprepared to deal with the kind of academic
pressure they will encounter in middle schools.
The report stated, “Freed from the dependency
of childhood, but not yet able to find their own path
to adulthood, many young people feel a desperate sense
of isolation.”
The last thing such children need is to be displaced
from the secure, familiar environment of their elementary
schools and put into an impersonal environment where
they are shuffled from one class to another. Educators
from Johns University confirmed this. Many middle schools
are created to satisfy a school system’s shifting
enrollment trend, not to meet the children’s educational
needs. According to the report, Robert Francis, educator
and columnist for Parents Magazine, said, “Problems
of declining enrollments are the main cause for the
sudden conversion of middle schools.” Parents
should not “assume that the best interests of
children come first when radical shifts in school organization
are made,” he said.
No major studies have compared the academic performance
of middle school and junior high school students. If
shifting enrollment trends do, in fact, create an artificial
demand for the middle school, then to allow population
shifts to dictate a change that may dramatically affect
the emotional development of a child is equally imprudent
as the cost proposed to construct the state of the art
facility.
Consequently, no data exists to supply facts about the
quality of what children learn. We are able to learn
about school buildings, costs per pupil, or find out
how many years children stay in school, but we have
no way of assessing whether the time spent in school
is effective. There are greater, more certain, and more
immediate penalties in this country for serving up a
single gad hamburger than for repeatedly furnishing
a thousand schoolchildren with a sub-standard education.
|
|
|

According to Richard Roth, Ulster Savings bank expressed
their " gratitude to County Legislator Robert Aiello
for his assistance from preliminary notification of branch
availability to the signing of the contract."
Without
Bob's help this would not have been possible."
-Richard Roth
Senior VP Ulster Savings Bank
- In
April, when Bob Aiello discovered that M&T would
be closing it's Twin Maples Branch, he contacted Ulster
savings bank officials with the idea of filling the
void.
- In
July, the lease was signed by Ulster Savings Bank
- In
August, Ulster Savings Bank received approval from the
New York State Banking Department and the FDIC.
- On
September 4, Ulster savings Bank officially opened it's
Twin Maples Branch, in Barclay Heights.
Bob
pens the issues to the press
| REFORM
HEALTHCARE NOW
There has been much discussion about
the cost of health insurance, who gets it for free,
who pays and who has nothing at all. While blame
is being cast indiscriminately, the United States
health care system itself is outrageously expensive,
while at the same time, blatantly inadequate.
Despite spending more than twice as much as the
rest of the industrialized world, the other advanced
nations provide comprehensive coverage to their
entire populations, while the U.S. still has 46
million people completely uninsured, with millions
more with inadequate coverage. This is so because
we spend more and get less because we operate with
a network of for profit payers who waste money on
items that have little nor nothing to do with healthcare;
overhead, billing, marketing, in addition to an
obligation to make profits, as well as exorbitant
executive salaries.
At the same time, doctors and hospitals are forced
to maintain expensive administrative staffs just
to deal with this bureaucracy. Consequently, about
31 percent of health premiums fall prey to needless
administrative costs. A single-payer, Medicare expanded
plan can capture this wasted money. The potential
savings on this administrative waste is estimated
to cost $350 billion annually, enough to provide
coverage to everyone without adding to what we already
pay, according to the American College of Physicians.
Under this plan, Americans would be covered for
everything that the best plans currently offer,
while patients can regain free choice of doctors
and hospitals. Meanwhile doctors, once again, would
have autonomy over patient care. This could be accomplished
by eliminating private insurers and taking back
the administrative waste, while new fees could be
imposed, replacing current, outrageously high premiums
paid by individuals and employers.
The time has come to stop talking about health care
reform and doing something about it. Bi-partisan
efforts putting politics aside are the catalyst
for change. The current system, left to continue,
is doomed.
|
TEAM
WITH MEXICO ON OIL
Immigration seems to be the new word in America and officials
just don’t know- or can’t make a decision
about what to do about the millions of illegal immigrants
that enter the U.S. each year, a great majority from Mexico.
Mexico has more to offer American and is tied to energy.
It is time to look at the options.
Three years of exploration have enabled Mexico to map
oil fields that will more than double its know crude oil
reserves. On a conservative estimate, almost 54 billion
barrels lie underneath these “new” oil fields.
This estimate takes Mexico’s reserves to 102 billion
barrels, more than the United Arab Emirates, which has
reserves of 97 billion barrels, Kuwait’s 94 billion
and Iran’s 89 billion, making it second only to
Iraq’s 112 billion.
The discovery would enable Mexico to increase its oil
production from the current level of 4 million barrels
a day to 7 million. Saudi Arabia produces 7.5 million
barrels a day. The good news about the discovery is the
magnitude of reserves is larger than Saudi Arabia. The
bad news is that the complexity of the technology needed
to exploit the oil fields and levels of investment required
are beyond Mexico’s nationalized company’s
capability, so the company is trying to attract multi-national
corporations with enough capital to invest and the most
up to date extraction technology.
My point is simple: American oil companies have recently
reaped enormous profits because of incidents in the Middle
East and the recent threat from Iran to produce nuclear
weapons. American technology is the catalyst that could
allow Mexico to be the largest oil producer in the world,
and be on the American border. With America’s help,
Mexico becomes a major world oil exporter, and new revenues
help establish a strong Mexican economy. NAFTA now becomes
a more viable concept, and at the same time, helps diminish
America’s dependence on Arab oil, shielding our
economy from the ravages of an unstable energy market.
JUNK THE PROPERTY TAX
Property
tax reform?
The best way to fix the property tax is to, junk it. The
origin of property taxes goes back over 200 years when
the majority of people owned farms. During this era, most
income came from “real property.” The more
land you owned, the more income you had. But the income
was in the form of crops, making it difficult to determine
income. The property tax made sense.
Today, farmers are scarce and very few people are receiving
income from land and buildings. Consequently, property
taxes are crudely based on the ability to pay them because
land and buildings are no longer related to our wealth.
Rising sale prices are resulting in increased assessments,
but prices are affected by supply and demand. This is
an inaccurate measure of property. When demand for housing
is high, price is high. When demand is low, price is low.
For example, if someone agrees t pay $250,000 for a house
assessed for $90,000, that doesn’t mean that the
house is worth $250,000.
We are currently experiencing an influx of buyers from
New York City who view our real estate prices as bargains,
while the majority of young families can’t meet
the down payments on handyman specials. Our economy does
not provide the means for young families to buy a home,
let alone pay the taxes. Taxes in some rural areas of
Saugerties are in excess of $5000. Additional mortgage
payments of $1000 plus per month are common. This is a
recipe for disaster.
The exodus from New York City is the driving force behind
exploding home prices. Without a local business base,
property taxes will rise to levels forcing us with roots
here to sell. The fact that our own college graduates
need to find work out of the area, and that our senior
citizen population is rising, should be enough to see
the handwriting on the wall.
|
“Robert Aiello is a legislator with
grass roots to the community, dedication to our citizens and above
all a friend who is there for you at all times!”
Maria Ruffner
Saugerties
|